Sunday, July 13, 2014

Don’t give up your day job …

I believe anyone who pursued bonsai as a hobby, at some point asked oneself: “What if it was my job?” To many of us it’s a rhetorical question with a regretful aftertaste. However, I recently read something that softened my regret.

It was a collection of anecdotes about practitioners of the tea ceremony (Cha-no-yu) in the 17th century Japan. I should explain that, a lot of them were professional soldiers and Cha-no-yu was their pastime. However, some of them got so involved in it, that it was detrimental to their career and family (Cha-no-yu was and still is a very expensive hobby).

Anyway, one of the stories was about Hosokawa Tadaoki, a prominent military commander and a renowned Tea Master. After his retirement, he was a highly sought teacher of Cha-no-yu as he was the only remaining disciple of Sen no Rikyu. He often urged his samurai students:

You must remember that it is your military prowess that has obtained your fiefs and honors. Do not then neglect your main business. It may be well enough to occupy any spare time you may have with Cha-no-yu, but never let a diversion take the place of the work of life.”

He knew that he was able to learn Cha-no-yu from the best and become a master himself only because he served as a soldier till the shōgun allowed him to retire. Somehow, this quote made me feel more respectful of my day-time occupation.

This story also has a connection to bonsai. Hosokawa Tadaoki was a close associate of shōgun Tokugawa Iemitsu, the one ruler of Japan who was crazy about bonsai (for more info see: http://www.phoenixbonsai.com/bigpicture/IemitsuPine.html).

Was it enough talk about Cha-no-yu for one post? Not yet. I’d like to show here some ‘non-bonsai-pot’ things I make out of clay. Image on the left shows an Ido style raku tea bowl and the one on the right shows a wood-fired katatsuki type tea caddy. No matter where and how someone drinks tea, one has got to have a cup and a container for the tea leaves.


Friday, July 11, 2014

Frost



I have been growing bonsai in the same area of Sydney for the past 7 years, but I’ve never seen my trees to be exposed to sub-zero temperatures. This morning I found frost on some of the leaves and ice in the drip trays. The lowest night temperature for my area was reported to be 6°C and at the time of taking the photos shown above the temperature was reported to be 18°C. A disparity of 20 degrees! No wonder everybody thinks there is global warming.

Monday, July 07, 2014

This year’s bonsai pots

I haven’t posted anything about bonsai pots made by me this year. There is only a handfull and they are not that impressive. Nevertheless, I would like to record some of them here. Few were fired in an electric kiln (see images below).

Images above:
1 – 9 x 6.5 cm, round, stoneware, rutile glaze
2 – 24 x 6 cm, round, stoneware, tenmoku over rutile grlaze
2a – close-up of the rim
2b – close-up of a glaze “tear”
3 – 17 x 8 cm, round, stoneware, white glaze
4 – 16.5 x 6.5 cm, round, stoneware, rutile glaze

I also had a couple of pots fired in a wood-fired kiln. To my surprise they were rather plain (see images below).

Image above left – 15 x 6 cm, round, stoneware, rutile glaze
Image above right – 14.5 x 5 cm, round, stoneware, white glaze

There was also something I’ve never done before. I put a bonsai pot though a raku firing. As you can see form the images below it ended up “in tears”, happy tears in this particular case (see the close-up below). The pot is 17 x 5 cm, round, decorated with white crackle glaze. 

You may say raku firing is useless for bonsai pots. The clay is not fully vitrified and the pots will not be durable. You are right, but such pots can be waterproofed with one of the products available on the market and used only for the duration of an exhibition. I think it was still worth it!

Sunday, July 06, 2014

Ray Nesci technique: 5 years later



Five years ago, I published a blog post about a technique shown by Ray Nesci at "Bonsai by the Harbour 2009" (left image above, for details see: http://lomov.blogspot.com.au/2009/07/ray-nescis-tecnique.html). Last month, I got a chance to see this Azalea after a five-year period (image above left). I think the technique works and the resulting tree has the potential. The technique allows to achieve thick trunk and fully formed branches in a relatively short period of time.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Pest of the month: Common Crow Butterfly



This growing season a number of my bonsai trees have been attacked by caterpillars. I noticed that some of them belonged to moth families Noctuidae and Geometridae. However, I didn’t expect for one of my trees to be attacked by a butterfly. While styling a Ficus benjamina shown on the leftmost photo, I spotted several empty chrysalises attached to its leaves. After a quick look I found an unhatched chrysalis (photo in the middle). This is a chrysalis of the Common Crow Butterfly (Euploea core) and you can see how the adult butterfly looks like in the photo on the right. Common Crow caterpillars are orange and white with black stripes. Their striking appearance serves as a warning to predators. Ficus sap contains toxins such as ficusin and its derivatives are stored in the fatty tissues of the Common Crow caterpillars. These toxins make caterpillars distasteful to vertebrate predators. This also could be the reason why the chrysalis is so flashy.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Imperial palaces and “bonsai pots” in Beijing




Visiting the Forbidden City and the Summer Palace in Beijing was fun. I was struck by the sheer scale of these establishments. I could see that in the past both places were magnificent, but today they look somewhat run down. The leadership is probably not keen on showcasing the glamour of the old days.



One aspect of interior décor there was common occurrence of fake plants. These fake plants were made of many different materials and always came in pairs. In fact, traditional Chinese interior design is very symmetrical and to accommodate that many furnishings must come in identical or almost identical pairs. Anyway, the containers housing those fake plants are the main topic of this post. Images below show some of the containers I spotted in various buildings.



These containers were made of a wide range of materials. The materials included porcelain, metal with vitreous enamel, wood, red lacquer, jade and stone. It was difficult to take good photos of them because they often were in poorly lit areas behind one or two layers of glass. They were quite amazing nevertheless. As you can see they closely resemble bonsai pots.



Some of them were either completely made of jade or had carved jade inlays (see images below).



Another item of interest was a bronze crane stature in the Forbidden City, which is shown in the images below. On closer examination of the base of this stature I found that it depicts a suiban with a mountain landscape on a stand. Looking for additional information about this statue on the Internet revealed that the base and the stature are two separate pieces and in the not too distant past this stature was displayed on the same stone pedestal, but without the base. I wonder if the base was originally created as an artefact of its own.




To see other posts about my bonsai adventures in China visit these:

Monday, February 03, 2014

Good penjing book


Over the years I have seen a few books on penjing. They had my curiosity, but this book got my attention. I didn’t expect to find it in a souvenir shop of the Humble Administrator’s Garden in Suzhou, but it was the most appropriate place to find it. After turning a few pages I knew that this book is for me. It features studio quality photos of 312 penjing (single trees, forests, rocks and shohin stand displays). All of them are of exceptional quality. The fact that it is all in Chinese doesn’t hinder my appreciation of it. I have gone through this book a couple of times and feel like doing it again and again.

Written by Xu Wen Tao (徐文涛), titled “Appreciation of Chinese Penjing” (中国盆景欣), published in 2001, ISBN 7-5323-6359-7/J.41.



Friday, December 27, 2013

Did Mughals have dwarf trees grown in containers?


I was looking at the photos of the Rare Book Society of India Facebook page and came across this one. It is a detail of a gouache painting on paper, Bundi style, Rajasthan school, early 18th century (Copyright Trustees of the British Museum). The plant growing in a container with feet is surprisingly similar to bonsai. Did such plants really exist in Mughal India or this plant was simply imagined by the artist?

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Evidence of bonsai in a 15th century Kyoto tearoom

I am reading A. L. Sadler’s “The Japanese Tea Ceremony: Cha-No-Yu”, published in 1933. The book has a description of the formal style tea room of Murata Shukō* (1423–1502) who is considered to be the founder of the Japanese tea ceremony. Here is the part of it, which got my attention:
 
On the walls of this room there are said to have been black-and-white sketches by Engo Zenji**, while in the Tokonoma either a single picture or a set of two was displayed. In front of this was a stand with an incense burner and a flower vase, either one of the ordinary sort or a small one with a single flower. Boxes of stationery and Tanzaku or poem slips, ink stone and bookstand, a tray-garden***, and jars for leaf-tea are also mentioned, so that it is evident that this Tearoom was much like an ordinary study in its furnishings and not specialized as afterwards.
 
For me, the significance of this passage is that the founder of Japanese tea ceremony had bonsai in his tearoom/study!

*    The ‘wabi-cha’ teachings of Murata Shukō were picked up by Takeno Jōō (1502-1555)  who in turn taught Sen no Rikyū (1522 -1591). Sen no Rikyū had an enormous impact on Japanese aesthetics and culture as a whole. Needless to say this impact extends to bonsai aesthetics as well.
**   as far as I know Engo Zenji was a Zen Master and a writer.
*** "tray-garden" is probably Sadler's literal translation of the word 'bonsai' or a similar term.

Saturday, December 07, 2013

The last bonsai pot of 2013


I haven’t been making any new bonsai pots since August and when our wood-firing group decided to have one last firing this year, I had only one small pot made months ago (14 x 6 cm, round). After the firing it turned out to be very unpretentious and I happen to like that in pots (see leftmost image above). This kiln firing was the longest our group had so far. Usually our firings take anywhere between 12 and 17 hours, but this one took 22 hours. I also would like to point out an interesting observation. All three images shown above depict the same rutile glaze, applied on the same buff stoneware clay and fired in the same kiln. The difference is that these three pots were fired in different parts of the kiln and came from three different kiln firing events. The colour range is amazing – from black to beige!

Tuesday, December 03, 2013

On the Origin of Bonsai Appeal to Man

I wrote this article earlier this year and after a couple of unsuccessful
attempts to publish it in bonsai magazines it found its home here.
I wanted to explain my strong emotions towards bonsai
and
I hope that others may find my explanations acceptable.
Let me know what you think and leave a comment.


Have you ever wondered why people enjoy looking at bonsai? The joy we derive from viewing bonsai is the very essence of its existence. However, the reasons why certain features make bonsai appealing to us are inexplicit. For instance, just saying that a tree is balanced doesn’t explain why balance is a desirable quality. These thoughts led me to seek a better understanding of our perception of bonsai.


The answers came from my training as a biologist. As a matter of fact, I came up with four theories outlining the reasons for the visual appeal of bonsai. But first, I need to make a little disclaimer. Strictly speaking, my theories here are speculations. As a scientist, I view them as hypotheses, which ought to be tested. Some of my statements, though, may be supported by existing scientific literature, but the review of this literature is beyond the scope of this essay. Its aim is only to convey my ideas.   


Theory One: Arboreal refuge

Humans can quickly and accurately assess individual trees and favourably assessed trees are perceived by us as beautiful. Such assessments take us seconds, we do them subconsciously. It is simply our instinct. Modern humans don’t need to assess trees for their beauty, but we have this ability anyway. Why? I believe this ability is a leftover from our evolutionary past.


From around 85 million year ago till about 4 million years ago our distant ancestors lived on trees. During this long evolutionary period our ancestors’ ability to assess trees for their suitability as a refuge was ‘hardwired’ in their brains and became an instinct. Although, in the last 4 million years, our ancestors gradually discontinued their arboreal way of life and lost the need for this instinct, its remnants are still present in the workings of our mind. This leads to the question of what makes a tree beautiful? Well, I think the qualities which make us perceive trees as ‘beautiful’ are structural stability and complexity.

To illustrate my point about structural stability I made a diagram shown below and asked ten random work colleagues: “Which tree has the most pleasing shape?” Nine out of ten chose option ‘b’, which happens to be the most structurally stable tree of the lot. It would also make the best bonsai in my opinion.

While shapes ‘a’, ‘c’ and ‘d’ are less stable than ‘b’, shape ‘e’ is quite stable, yet test participants didn’t find it pleasing, and I know why. Shape ‘e’ is a shrub. Shrubs don’t get you out of a predator’s reach. At the same time, they provide predators with a hiding place to ambush you. In the past, our ancestors survived by being wary of shrubs and today we still prefer the looks of a tree to that of a shrub. 

To clarify what I meant earlier by the complexity of a tree, I made another diagram, where the number of branches on a tree represents its complexity. The diagram is shown below. I asked the same ten colleagues the same question: “Which tree has the most pleasing shape?” Seven out of ten chose option ‘c’ and two people chose option ‘a’. The majority of people preferred trees with a more complex branch structure. If these trees were bonsai you would be foolish to choose anything but ‘c’.

Suddenly, all those rules for styling bonsai begin to take a new meaning. Features of bonsai such as buttress roots, thick trunk, trunk taper, golden ratio proportions, apex above the trunk base and balanced branching are characteristics of a stable structure. On the other hand, features such as dead branches, exposed wood, hollowed trunk, ruggedly textured bark, fruit, flowers, unusually coloured foliage and fine branching are characteristics which adorn bonsai with layers of complexity. When the trunk line of a bonsai is visible, we see all those characteristics clearly and it is easier for us to appreciate a bonsai. We strive to make our bonsai ‘beautiful’ and without realising it, create representations of arboreal refuges favored by our prehistoric ancestors. We like bonsai because they look like our primeval home.

Theory Two: Miracle of survival

The arguments I made so far explain the appeal of structurally stable trees or what we classify in bonsai as upright styles, but what about other tree shapes? Here, I would like to explain the appeal of bonsai that portray trees struggling against the elements of nature. This category includes such bonsai styles as literati, cascade, wind-blown, struck-by-lightning, drift-wood, root-over-rock, raft and sometimes other styles. 

A bizarre or improbable survival of a living thing often attracts our attention. We feel sympathy and compassion at witnessing survival against all odds. This is the emotion that compels us to protect nature. We marvel at an antelope’s escape from the lion’s claws and we wonder at a stunted tree clinging to a cliff face. Knowing the source of this emotion could explain the attraction held by bonsai implying such miraculous survival.

According to a widely acclaimed book titled “The Selfish Gene”, written by an evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, the cause of such compassion towards other living things is our genetic relatedness to them. The more genes we share with another living organism the more compassionate we feel towards it. Genetically, we are most closely related to our parents, siblings and offspring and they are usually the ones we care about the most. We would care more about a pet dog than a pet fish, because we share more genes with a dog. I hear you asking: Are we really related to plants? The answer is yes. We share many genes with plants and all other living species on our planet, including bacteria. As we are only distantly related to plants our sympathy towards them is not very strong. Humans kill plants often enough, however we also protect rare species and grow plants for no practical use. Bonsai is one example of that.

Bonsai styles such as literati, cascade and a few others often represent somewhat extreme cases of survival, which evoke compassion more effectively. I should also note that my ‘miracle of survival’ and ‘arboreal refuge’ theories often work together. For example, a cascade bonsai with a thick trunk and balanced branches would create a stronger appeal. I hope you are beginning to see that the psychology of our perception of bonsai is quite complex and my next theory is going to add yet another layer of complexity.

Theory Three: Field of dreams

Here, I would like to explain the appeal of bonsai forests, rock plantings, saikei, bonkei, some suiseki and even certain types of Oriental gardens. All these art forms have one common denominator - they represent landscapes. Here we need to think beyond individual trees and ask ourselves a couple of questions. First: “Why do we enjoy looking at landscapes in general?” and second: “What landscape features hold stronger appeal to us and why?”

To answer these questions I used the power of Google to do a little survey. I entered search criterion ‘beautiful landscape’ in Google Images and examined the top one hundred results. The landscape images were very diverse and depicted deserts, sea, mountains, forests, cities and more. First, I tried to find something that was present in each and every one of those one hundred landscapes. It became immediately obvious that it wasn’t any particular physical feature of the landscape. The only common attribute they all shared was the abundance of open space. In 94% of the landscapes the viewer could see further than one kilometer and 91% of them featured a distant horizon.

This indicates that open space is highly pleasing to human eye. The ability to see danger from afar was essential to our survival, so was the ability to see the choices for food and shelter. On the subconscious level, we feel safer when our line of sight is uninterrupted, but our conscious mind tells us that we see beautiful surroundings. One example that supports this theory is a seascape. The sea is not our habitat, but we love looking at it, just because our line of sight is uninterrupted. Another example is looking at a cityscape from a tall building. The landscape we see is completely artificial, yet it is pleasing to us because our line of sight is uninterrupted again.

The answer to my first question about landscapes is quite simple. We enjoy looking at vast expanses of open space, because we can see what’s out there, and it makes us feel safe. We like bonsai representing landscapes because they imply distance and open space. Such bonsai evoke subconscious emotions of safety, which are rationalised by our conscious mind as beauty.

Now, let’s examine specific landscape features to assess their appeal to us. We must keep in mind that a large stretch of open space is the most desirable landscape trait and no other feature can beat that 100 out of 100 score. I used the same one hundred images to score other landscape attributes. I counted how many images out of hundred contained a particular attribute. These counts are also percentages and they are shown in the table below.

The list of attributes that scored over fifty percent was surprisingly small. The percentages also prioritised the importance of these landscape attribute. The diagram below is a generalized representation an average landscape containing trees, grassland, water, mountains and lots of open space. Many images in that top one hundred looked similar to this.
 

Trees and grassland were the most desirable landscape attributes. They are also the only two components you need to create your basic bonsai forest. In fact, even single tree bonsai often suggest a lone tree on a hill or in a meadow. In a formal bonsai display such a suggestion is aided by the use of grasses as accent plants. From the scientific point of view, the importance of trees and grassland makes perfect sense. Humans, as a species, evolved in ecosystems which were a mixture of forest and grassland. When we see a combination of forest and grassland our instincts tell us that we are in the right place. These two habitats can provide us with a variety of food and shelter we need for survival.

The third most important landscape attribute was water and its importance is self-understood. However, the importance of mountains needs an explanation. I have talked at length about the uninterrupted line of sight. Well, very often you have to be on top of a mountain to have it. Hills and mountains provided early humans with vantage points necessary for hunting, gathering and security.

Mountains are also a source of a different kind of appeal. What do you think was the best shelter a prehistoric human could wish for? It was a cave, and caves are found in mountains. Think of our modern brick houses. They are nothing but artificial caves. Humans stopped using caves in prehistory because they learned how to custom-make them from a variety of materials. In fact, this was one of the key inventions which allowed humans to multiply and spread to less favourable environments.     

I hope you are beginning to understand why bonsai suggesting open space, trees, grass, water and rock are so appealing to us. They tap into our instincts and our mind embraces these elements as something attractive. In reality though, we enjoy looking at such bonsai because they portray places promising survival.

Theory Four: Tree in disguise

After providing a few different explanations for the visual appeal of bonsai, I could still see one more. It concerns the category of bonsai whose shape suggests something other than a tree. This category includes trees like the ‘welcome pine’ reminding us of a person with an open arm. It also includes trees which look like dragons, Chinese language characters and sometimes other objects.

Appreciation of such bonsai requires not instinct, but conscious and abstract thought. In the case of the ‘welcome pine’ we have to create an abstract idea of a particular shape through observing and analysing shapes of real life objects such as a person with an open arm, a specific famous tree in China and a bonsai tree resembling both. We like looking at the ‘welcome pine’ bonsai because making connections between these seemingly unrelated objects is enjoyable to us. To understand why we enjoy it, think of a prehistoric human capable of recognising a predator camouflaged as foliage or a prey camouflaged as a rock. Making such connections could be a matter of life and death to our distant ancestors. In our evolutionary past natural selection favoured individuals with better abilities for abstract thinking and our brain evolved to reward it with positive emotions. Such evolutionary adaptation allowed our species to discover and innovate, which in turn immensely increased our chances of survival.

Today, we enjoy solving puzzles even when there are no immediate rewards associated with them. Problem solving triggers positive emotions in our brain and recognising that a bonsai tree looks like something else makes us feel happy.
*  *  *  *
I have tried my best to explain why people enjoy looking at bonsai, but how can my theories help an average bonsai practitioner? I believe that bonsai traits identified in my theories can be used as a series of guidelines for creating, displaying and judging bonsai. Whenever you look at a bonsai and feel that something is missing - check it against the following criteria:

  • Does it convey a sense of stability?
  • Does it combine multiple points of interest to depict sufficient complexity?
  • Does it portray a struggle against nature?
  • Does it suggest an open landscape, perhaps with water or rocks?
  • Does its shape allude to anything other than a tree?

These criteria are very well known to the bonsai community, but now you have possible explanations for how they interact with your mind and why it is important to incorporate them into your bonsai design.
 

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Sydney Bonsai Spectacular 2013


I was really happy to learn that Sydney Bonsai Spectacular is happening again. So far, it took place only once in 2011 and it was much better than your average local bonsai club show. At this point, Australia can’t have a national exhibition because of quarantine restrictions between the states. An event like Sydney Bonsai Spectacular is the closest thing we have to the national exhibition. This time, I anticipated it to be just like the last one if not better. To my regret the standard of bonsai this year was less impressive, but the suiseki display was a little better. Images above show some of the trees I liked. All three of them have pleasing shapes, but require further refinement.
 
I know that bonsai enthusiasts in Sydney have some really good trees, but we don’t see them at our bonsai exhibitions. The only way to encourage people to come forward with their best trees is to make it a competition for an attractive price. It can be a prestigious trophy, cash or something else.
  
As for the suiseki, Sydney Bonsai Spectacular had a few interesting ones (see images below). Some of them featured fine daizas or suibans. Some had faults in their display, but suitable display accessories can be hard to find.

Tuesday, October 01, 2013

Pest of the month: Asian Woolly Hackberry Aphid


Several years ago, one of the members of my bonsai club showed me a bonsai infested with woolly aphids. I couldn’t investigate what species it was at that time, but last month I have come across some woolly aphids on Chinese Hackberry (Celtis sinensis) (images above). This time I had the opportunity to identify the species. Images below show microscope sild specimens of winged and wingless adults, which have to be prepared for species identification. It turned out to be the Asian Woolly Hackberry Aphid (Shivaphis celti), an exotic species recently introduced to Australia. Woolly aphids such as Asian Woolly Hackberry Aphid can be a real nuisance. They quickly multiply and draw large amounts of plant sap to secrete a sugary substance or honeydew and deposit it on the plant’s surface. It is intended as ant food in exchange for protection ants provide to the aphids. However, in the absence of ants honeydew gets infected with sooty mould fungus, which blackens the leaves. Don’t let it happen and kill woolly aphids with an insecticide as soon as you notice them on your bonsai.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Exhibition of Bonsai Society of Australia

Another year, another annual exhibition of Bonsai Society of Australia. Some of the better trees are shown in the images above. They are not perfect, but their owners made some effort to refine them. There were many trees with tremendous potential; however, without a period of frequent wiring, pruning and styling their potential seemed wasted.

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Demonstration by Robert Steven


At the beginning of this month, I attended this year’s “Tops Weekend” (Weekend Workshops at Stanwell Tops organised by the Illawarra Bonsai Society). The main demonstrator this year was Robert Steven, a bonsai artist from Indonesia known internationally for his two books. He practices bonsai at his bonsai centre in Jakarta. I was there just for a day and saw his two workshops and a demonstration. Images below show some of the trees from the workshops. Images on the left depict each tree before the workshop and images on the right show them after the workshop.


During the workshops Robert kept on emphasising that ‘bonsai rules’ are only guidelines designed for beginners. Once you understand the rationale behind the rules, you should follow the rationale and not necessarily the rules. As an example he drew two trees. One was a typical bonsai while the other was a tree with the first branch very short and growing at mid-height of the tree (not 1/3). The lengths of other branches of this tree were drawn at random as well. To my surprise the tree that didn’t follow classic bonsai rules looked more interesting and natural.
 

Another interesting observation Robert made is that bonsai represent trees seen from close distance rather than from far away. This is why bonsai with the first branch located relatively high on the trunk are preserved by us as taller trees. To fit the look of a tree viewed from close quarters bonsai must have a sufficient amount of detail. Features such as irregularly shaped foliage pads can provide that level of detail.


He said that one of the common mistakes made by many bonsai practitioners is shaping the canopy of a deciduous or a tropical tree as if it is a conifer in a triangular shape. Bonsai design must always take into account natural growth habits of a species. That way the bonsai will look genuine and will tell a story of its native habitat.


Robert reminded the participants to turn defects into features, but at the same time warned not have too many features: “The more you show, the less people see”.
 

He also pointed out the importance of negative spaces and ‘in-and-out’ spaces in the tree canopy. They make trees look more natural. Robert stressed that asymmetric balance is a very important concept in bonsai design. However, group plantings must have a focal point as well as asymmetric balance in overall composition.
 

Another thing I liked about Robert was that he was full of curious facts. Botanical terminology, plant anatomy, etymology of bonsai terms, etc. He said that he comes by such facts while doing research for his books.


In the evening, Robert did a demonstration. He decided not to do another conifer demonstration, which would produce an ‘instant bonsai’. Instead, he asked the audience to choose a couple of deciduous trees from a small batch of advanced bonsai stock. The first choice was the messiest tree in the batch with a seemingly confusing multitude of trunks (image 1 below). After a preliminary pruning of branches and roots, the number and shape of the trunks became more apparent. The position of the trunks in relation to each other was somewhat symmetrical (image 2 below). To overcome this, Robert changed the angle of the tree (image 3 below). This was followed by the removal of all unnecessary branches, which made the tree look unimpressive (image 4 below). For a finishing touch, however, Robert had a very impressive trick. He pulled out a bunch of artificial brunches made of wire and stated attaching them to the trunks to simulate the future development of the tree. The effect was very convincing indeed (image 5 below). The demonstration was quite entertaining.
 

The second tree chosen by the audience had a single trunk (image 1 below) and the demonstration involved a gradual removal of branches (image 2 below) with the final result shown in the image 3 below. This demonstration was more simple and straightforward.
 

As a whole, it was a fun day.